|
Test Database for Digital Visual Resources in Art History
|
|
Anne R. Kenney
Director of Programs
Council on Library and Information Resources
|
Clifford Lynch
Executive Director
Coalition for Networked Information
|
|
|
The Council on Library and Information Resources is supporting a planning
phase to investigate the development of rich test database of digital
visual resources in art history. The image database would have sufficient
breadth, depth, and variety to constitute a ground-proofed collection for
the field and will be promoted as a community resource to provide a common
benchmark against which to measure and compare processes and approaches.
It is envisioned that the database will be developed in such a way that it
serves the broad humanities computing culture in general and the art
history field in particular. Its availability could provide a powerful
unifying force for comparative analysis that supports a range of
disciplines, technological approaches, and longitudinal studies. Such
test databases exist in other domains--full text, fingerprints,
handwriting, photography, and face recognition and their availability has
driven the development of new processes and products.
CLIR is supporting the work of a small planning group, chaired by Cliff
Lynch, which will develop a formal proposal for the test database that can
be submitted to funders in 2001.
|
|
|
|
handout
(in PDF format) 8K file size
|
|
From Static to Dynamic - Development of a Database Driven Gateway to
Library Information and Resources
|
|
Phyllis S. Mirsky
Deputy University Librarian
University of California, San Diego
|
R. Bruce Miller
Associate University Librarian - User Support Services
University of California, San Diego
|
|
|
The University of California, San Diego Libraries have developed a new
web infrastructure in support of delivering library resources. This
system enables non-programmers to easily create an almost infinite
variety of web pages. The site provides users with a subset of
available knowledge, carefully selected to support programmatic
needs. Currently there are 8,000 distinct subject and type pages online.
Key to this initiative is an underlying relational database of selected
resources. Subject specialists identify and select resources and services
and enter them into the database known as Sage. Descriptive data elements
are added to enhance the retrieval and display. These database records
form the content for dynamically created web pages that are assembled
"on the fly" when a user browses Sage.
Text from each Sage record is also copied into a Netscape Compass Server
database and is indexed in that full text index. To further expand
access, URLs from Sage records become the starting point for spidering
by Compass to find other potentially relevant resources. The level of
spidering is assigned by each record creator in order to control
subsequent search results. Sage streamlines the creation and maintenance
of web pages by reducing redundant work on the part of web authors and
facilitates sharing of data among web authors for resources relevant
to more than one subject area. Sage provides for efficient data entry,
easy updating of web resources, and custom designed page building for
both static and dynamic pages. Selected records from the OPAC are
exported into the database to provide an integrated array of
resources. Java, Servlets, and JDBC enabled SQL database access were
used to establish a foundation for future migration to potential
new technologies.
|
|
|
|
handout
(in PDF format) 9K file size
|
|
A Digital Strategy for the Library of Congress
|
|
Dale Flecker
Associate Director for Planning and Systems
Harvard University
|
James R. Blackaby
Director, Internet Strategies/Information Services
Mystic Seaport Museum
|
|
|
Nancy Frishberg
Executive Director
New Media Centers
|
|
|
The digital revolution--the proliferation of digital information, digital
networks, and the World Wide Web--makes it possible to distribute information
easily, in innovative ways, and for dramatically lower cost. This revolution
is challenging policies and practices throughout our society, but those
institutions whose primary charter is to provide access to information,
such as libraries, archives, and publishers, are perhaps most affected. What
does it mean to "collect" digital information if Web links cause the physical
location of information to be irrelevant? How does our society ensure that
digital information is preserved for future generations? How must the roles
of libraries, publishers, and other institutions evolve? What do the answers
to these questions imply for the management of libraries and other
information-oriented institutions in the coming decade?
With an understanding of these profound changes underway, the Librarian of
Congress asked the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board (CSTB) of
the National Academy of Sciences to assist the Library of Congress, which
includes the U.S. Copyright Office, Congressional Research Service, and Law
Library of Congress, in developing the Library's strategy with regard to
information technology. Accordingly, CSTB empaneled its Committee on an
Information Technology Strategy of the Library of Congress. The committee
has completed its work and its final report,
LC21: A Digital Strategy for
the Library of Congress, will be presented and discussed at this
session by three members of the study committee.
|
|
|
|
handout
(in PDF format) 9K file size
|
|
Scientific Communities: Evolving Options Online
|
|
Thomas Hickerson
Associate University Librarian
Cornell University
|
Rick Johnson
Enterprise Director
SPARC
|
|
|
Project Euclid is an electronic publishing initiative led by the Cornell
University Library and the Duke University Press to advance effective and
affordable scholarly communication in theoretical and applied mathematics
and statistics. The Euclid site will support the entire span of scholarly
publishing from preprints to the distribution of published journals. It
will also provide journal editors with a tool kit to streamline their
editorial and peer review processes and publish in a timely and
cost-effective manner. Editors will pick and choose different tools to
meet their particular needs. They will be able to maintain a database of
their reviewers, post papers to a reviewer's password-protected pick-up
and drop-off space, and alert reviewers via e-mail regarding review
deadlines. Reviewers will submit their comments and/or the edited papers
confidentially. Editors will also be able link the revised version of a
paper to its preprint version, if applicable. After preparing articles
with the Euclid editorial tools, editors will then upload the articles
comprising a journal issue. Euclid's goal is to contribute to the the
creation of a vibrant online information community that is based on a
healthy balance of commercial enterprises, scholarly societies, and
independent publishers. The project is supported in part by The Andrew W.
Mellon Foundation and is a SPARC (the Scholarly Publishing and Academic
Resources Coalition) partnership.
BioOne <www.BioOne.org> is a
new Web-based aggregation of research in the
biological, ecological and environmental sciences. In this presentation,
SPARC Enterprise Director Rick Johnson provides a progress report on
BioOne's development in advance of its upcoming launch, scheduled for the
first half of 2001.
A broad selection of the journals published by many of the American
Institute of Biological Sciences' (AIBS) over 70 member societies will
form BioOne's core offerings. BioOne's development has been spearheaded
by its collaborating organizations, including AIBS, SPARC, the University of Kansas,
the Big 12 Plus Libraries Consortium, and Allen Press. BioOne development
has been funded by SPARC and Big 12 Plus member libraries, along with
other institutions that are committed to playing a leading role in
transforming scientific communications.
|
|
|
|
handout
(in PDF format) 19K file size
|
|
Contributor-Run Libraries: Learning from the Open Source Community
|
|
Paul Jones
Director of ibiblio.org
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
|
|
|
What if you could wave a wand, in this very Harry Potter decade, and make
libraries - at least digital libraries - more open, more easy to manage,
cheaper, and even more eclectic and democratic? What if content
contributors could submit, catalog, index, manage, rate and rank materials
in large collections themselves? I believe that, thanks to the innovations
from the Open Source community and perhaps more importantly the Free Software
community, that we can have a contributor-run library at this very moment.
|
|
|
|
handout
(in PDF format) 6K file size
|
|
IMS E-Learning Specifications: Technical Update
|
|
Thomas D. Wason
Technical Liaison
IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc.
|
|
|
IMS Working Groups gather functional requirements, technical capabilities,
and deployment priorities from end users, vendors, purchasers, and
managers. These requirements are consolidated into one or more
specifications as the groups follow a proven, open process to develop a
specification package consisting of a definition, XML binding and best
practice guide. Working Group documents undergo detailed internal review
by the IMS Technical Board before public drafts or releases are made
available to the public via the IMS Web site
<www.imsproject.org>.
Feedback from test beds, product developers and adopters is incorporated
through systematic revision cycles. Specifications for Content Packaging,
Question and Test Interoperability, Enterprise Data Exchange, and
Meta-data have been released. Specifications for Content Management and
for Learner Information Packaging and Exchange are nearing completion.
Working Groups which will gather requirements and develop specifications
for Instructional Design and for Accessibility by Disabled Learners are
being formed. This presentation will provide a technical overview of the
specifications so far produced and discuss their potential use in
mechanisms for locating, retrieving and (re)using networked learning
objects.
|
|
|
|
handout
(in PDF format) 19K file size
PPT handout
(in PDF format) 17K file size
|
|
ECURE 2001: Electronic Records Advocacy
|
|
Rob Spindler
University Archivist
Arizona State University
|
Jeremy Rowe
Head, Media Development
Arizona State University
|
|
|
The speakers will review successes of ECURE 2000: Preservation and Access
for Electronic College and University Records and engage participants in a
discussion of processes, topics and potential speakers for proposed executive
development seminars and the ECURE 2001 conference. ECURE programs are
dedicated to advocacy and dissemination of research, models and best
practices for management of electronic records produced by institutions
of higher education.
|
|
|
|
handout
(in PDF format) 21K file size
handout
(in PDF format) 23K file size
handout
(in PPT format) 69K file size
|