Subject: Re: Action Alert for Comments in FCC Advanced Services Inquiry
Daniel del Solar (dsolar@well.com)
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 16:17:43 -0700
Message-Id: <35EC8097.FCA8866D@well.com> Date: Tue, 01 Sep 1998 16:17:43 -0700 From: Daniel del Solar <dsolar@well.com> To: roundtable@cni.org Subject: Re: Action Alert for Comments in FCC Advanced Services Inquiry References: <3.0.3.32.19980901155218.008e1290@postoffice.att.net>
On 9/1/98, John Scwartz <schwartz@usa.net> wrote:
>
> On 9/1/98, Maureen Lewis <mlewis@apt.org> wrote:
> >
> > APT filed a petition on February 18, 1998, urging the FCC to undertake
> > simultaneous inquiry and rulemaking proceedings. The petition, suggests
> > specific measures for removing barriers to advanced network investment
> > and for affirmatively stimulating such investment. APT believes that
> > its proactive recommendations are a necessary corollary to easing
> > certain regulatory restrictions that discourage ILECs and new entrants
> > from building new sophisticated network facilities.
>
> Am I mistaken, or is this the very issue about which APT repeatedly has
> failed to respond on this very list? If so, why would APT expect that
> list members would be galvanized to action by this posting?
Maureen, Maureen, hello, can you hear us?
Why have you failed to respond to our repeated queries regarding this
very precise matter in the previous months? Please respond if you can
hear. Thanks
We hear you loud and clear, with this most recent posting. But your
silence was louder.
Daniel
Daniel del Solar
<dsolar@well.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a16 : Tue Mar 23 1999 - 03:33:40 EST