Subject: Re: The coming catastrophe
Ken Salomon (KSalomon@dlalaw.com)
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 09:54:36 -0400
Message-Id: <s5e66fe0.001@dlalaw.com> Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 09:54:36 -0400 From: Ken Salomon <KSalomon@dlalaw.com> To: roundtable@cni.org Subject: Re: The coming catastrophe
Jeffrey Miller <jj@excel.net> wrote:
>
> Vigdor Schreibman <fins98@worldnet.att.net> wrote:
> >
> > The plain facts that I have reported are true. It also
> > appears that Mark Huisman has been hijacked by
> > his emotional denial of the realities of savage capitalism.
> >
> > Let me clarify both.
> >
> > The Harvard-educated mathematician, Kacznski wrote a manifesto,
> > "Industrial Society and Its Future," in which he claims that the
> > industrial-technological system in which we live is a social,
> > psychological and environmental, "disaster for the human race."
>
> This list has lost its usefulness and direction in my humble opinion.
> There are many other sources of this information without having this
> list monopolized by one man seeking a political solution that repeated
> calls for the overthrow of a free market socity. A society that my
> forefathers and I'm sure many others fought for the right to preserve.
>
> Simply put, what I wished to be a source of information and education is
> a diatribe of failed ideological concepts that most of the civilized
> world is trying to seperate itself from. Hardly worth the time to read,
> even for its historical instruction of how mankind use to think. A list
> that has only this tired litany of ideas just isn't useful to me, but I
> do hope that it will find a place for itself soon.
>
> I apreciate that people have the right to express their opinion (even
> calling compassionate capitalism the enemy of democracy, that freedom
> means only what a few folks would have for us, that the rights that we
> fought so hard to obtain are only so much shallowness), and yet, I must
> decide that I for one will not continue to receive a list that is so
> dominated by one individual set on the overthrough of my country's
> constitution. Therefore, thank you all for your input and good fortune
> in the future to each of you. I will choose to "turn the channel" if
> you will. Just my personal choice. :) Thanks!
I, too, think it is time for me to switch channels. My reason
for joining the list was information gathering and sharing not
statements of political positions on the structure of government.
I have no doubt that many find the list of use and interest.
Ken Salomon
<ksalomon@dlalaw.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a16 : Tue Mar 23 1999 - 03:33:40 EST