roundtable: Re: feast-or-famine, FYI from Edupage
roundtable: Re: feast-or-famine, FYI from Edupage
Re: feast-or-famine, FYI from Edupage
Audrie Krause (akrause@igc.apc.org)
Sun, 3 Aug 1997 23:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sun, 3 Aug 1997 23:32:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <2.2.16.19970803233311.262f3aac@pop.igc.org>
To: roundtable@cni.org
From: Audrie Krause <akrause@igc.apc.org>
Subject: Re: feast-or-famine, FYI from Edupage
On 8/2/97, Jeffrey S. Hops <jhops@alliancecm.org> wrote:
>
> I second Jamie. Let's also remember that fees imposed to limit demand
> generally create a windfall for the entity receiving the revenue (a
> windfall that increases with congestion -- creating a perverse incentive
> to _limit_ supply). Does the edupage clip say who would be the recipient
> of this windfall -- particularly if the charge needed to control traffic
> is well in excess of actual cost? I can think of a number of public
> nonprofit institutions who could use the money more than Bell Atlantic
> or AOL. How about directing all usage control proceeds to the Universal
> Service school and Libary fund?
I second Jeff's suggestion. And I suspect that if a usage fee "windfall"
was required to go to public and nonprofit organizations, usage fee
advocates would have a sudden change of position. :-)
Audrie
--
Audrie Krause <<NetAction>> E-MAIL: audrie@netaction.org
601 Van Ness Ave., No. 631 San Francisco, CA 94102
TELEPHONE: (415) 775-8674 FAX: (415) 673-3813
* * * WEB: http://www.netaction.org * * *