gils: Re: Your Basic GILS Question

Re: Your Basic GILS Question

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Peter N. Weiss: "A "GILS Person" should probably be represented (?)."
• Previous message: C Michael Bright: "GILS at Depository Conference - Part Deux"

Message-Id: <315B6DEA.192F@initco.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1996 20:58:18 -0800
From: BERNADINE <ber@initco.net>
To: gils@cni.org
Subject: Re: Your Basic GILS Question

Borkowski, Tammy wrote:
> 
> In response to J. Timothy Sprehe's reprint of his August 1995 article in
>  FEDERAL
> COMPUTER WEEK ,  just a reminder that the DTIC GILS URL has since changed.
> 
> For a demo of the DoD GILS, see http://www.dtic.mil/staff/tborkows/
> 
> DoD agencies wanting to input records, see
> http://www.dtic.mil/defenselink/locator/
> 
> Developer's wanting more detail (scripts, etc .), see
>  http://skydive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/toolbox/     --->FreeGILS
> 
> Tammy Borkowski
> DTIC

Dear Gils fans:  I was happy that Tim's article showed the difference 
between a cataloging record and a gils record.  Some people give the 
impression that we can get along with only a gils record and yet Tim 
shows that a gils record leads the user to specific publication 
cataloging in catalogs.  Some policy makers who want to cut money may 
slide over the difference between the two and start cutting the budgets 
of those who catalog, like GPO, LC, the National libraries and other 
federal libraries.  That would be a great disservice to the public.
Bernadine Abbott Hoduski, Montana

• Next message: Peter N. Weiss: "A "GILS Person" should probably be represented (?)."
• Previous message: C Michael Bright: "GILS at Depository Conference - Part Deux"