amfc: Re: Status of AMFC
amfc: Re: Status of AMFC
Re: Status of AMFC
Jim Neal (jneal@jhu.edu)
Mon, 19 Jan 1998 08:25:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 1998 08:25:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Jim Neal <jneal@jhu.edu>
Subject: Re: Status of AMFC
In-Reply-To: <9801180202.AA11909@a.cni.org>
To: Craig A Summerhill <craig@cni.org>
Message-Id: <Pine.PCW.3.95.980119081902.10271B-100000@ladmin01.mse.jhu.edu>
Hi, Craig. I believe that the AMFC continues to exist very much in
spirit if not in substance. I feel that we have had an impact on
ALA and the organization is performing more effectively and with
greater impact in the key forums. Our initial goal was to outline
a platform for change and I see many of its elements reflected in
the ALA Goal 2000 effort. A secondary goal was to advance AMFC
individuals into positions of leadership in the organization and
that has been achieved with signigicant success. I believe that
there is still a place for AMFC and the values it advances, and would
welcome reactivation of our political efforts, especially if it
would bring new and good people into ALA Council who share a commitment
to advancing libraries and librarianship through ALA.
On Sat, 17 Jan 1998, Craig A Summerhill <craig@cni.org> wrote:
>
> Friends,
>
> Please excuse this intrusion...
>
> Since Paul died, I have naturally and unfortunately lost track of a
> few items that he used to manage. One of which is the ALA Members
> for Change. Can anybody tell me whether you all think this group
> (note: the caucus, not necessarily this list) is still active?
>
> I spoke briefly with Sue Martin about this at the Dulles airport on
> the way home from New Orleans. She suggested I speak to Peter, but I
> thought I'd just send a quick note to see if there was more widespread
> interest in this question. If there is a current platform or position
> statement for AMFC, I would be interested in reading it. Discretely,
> of course.
>
>
> In case you're wondering, I spoke with some people at a vendor reception
> in New Orleans who were interested (and seemingly motivated) to run for
> Council seats on a common platform. It occurred to me that many of
> their interests may overlap with AMFC, at least as far as I understood
> the general bent of this group.
>
> Thanks in advance for any assistance.